In a nutshell
A lack of optimism among investors, reduced expectations for the economy and profits are likely to support risky investments with more clarity on tariffs and tax cuts.
However, economic data that is difficult to interpret, a weaker US economy, Trump’s unpredictability, the war between Israel and Iran and the risk of rising yields on long-term bonds keep the risk high and argue against large positions.
We continue to favour gold, industrial metals and equities. Setbacks in equities should offer opportunities. In bonds, our focus remains on capturing risk premiums with shorter to medium duration. Gold remains the largest overweight.
Portfolio positioning at a glance
We used the market correction at the beginning of April due to the customs announcement to increase our equity allocation to a slight overweight. After the rapid recovery of the stock markets following the customs pause announced a few days later, we took these profits. We also benefited from a temporary tactical reduction in gold. We remain convinced that, in view of the high level of uncertainty, a balanced, well-diversified positioning and the use of increased volatility for tactical, anti-cyclical positions makes more sense than taking large active positions with only limited conviction. Our strategies therefore remain broadly diversified and almost balanced. However, our conviction that tangible assets should be preferred to nominal government bonds in an environment of exploding government debt and structurally higher inflation is clearly reflected in our positioning. Gold remains the largest overweight and is supplemented by other commodities, especially industrial metals, in strategies that allow this. Equities are slightly overweighted. Bonds, especially government bonds, are underweighted. In the case of bonds, we prefer covered bonds, high-yield bonds and local currency bonds from emerging markets.
Berenberg Asset Allocation

Review of the second quarter – lots of volatility, little trend
Trump’s announcement of reciprocal tariffs on 2 April trig-gered the fastest and sharpest sell-off in equities since the COVID-19 crisis. Volatility also rose to its highest level since March 2020. The uncertainty on the markets was so great that Trump suspended the announced tariffs for 90 days just a few days later. The same step was only taken for China after a further escalation in May. The stock markets subsequently recovered from their correction and are now close to the levels seen at the start of the quarter. It became apparent that the budget deficit in the US is likely to increase further. In line with this, the rating agency Moody’s downgraded the creditworthiness of the US. Yields on long-term US government bonds rose and the US dollar depreciated further. Fears about growth weighed on industrial metals and, together with announced OPEC production increases, depressed the oil price until the Israel-Iran conflict gave them tailwind. The price of gold continued to rise.
Gold rises again in Q2, Euro bonds with positive development, equities largely unchanged, oil prices fall slightly, dollar significantly
Economic outlook – data in summer not very meaningful
With the tariff chaos, negative US growth in the first quarter and negative US economic surprises, the consensus expectation for US growth in 2025 has fallen by around 1ppt from its high in February to 1.4%. Companies are holding back on investments and consumers on spending. In Europe, expectations are only slightly lower but a recovery appears to be delayed. Earnings growth expectations for 2025 have also been revised downwards globally, for example for the S&P 500 from 14% at the start of the year to just 8% at present, despite the positive Q1 reporting season. The reduced expectations are much more realistic, especially for US earnings, which are benefiting from the weak dollar. More clarity on tariffs and prospects of US tax cuts increasingly support the economy. However, the economic and earnings data for the second quarter are unlikely to provide a clear picture. The underlying picture is overshadowed by tariff effects. For example, high imports (pull-forward effects) weighed on US growth in the first quarter. The collapse in imports in the second quarter could now support growth. US inflation is likely to pick up again and the Middle East conflict is causing higher oil prices. Uncertainty will remain high.
Declining growth expectations, especially for the US
With the Trump hype, expected US growth in 2025 peaked in Febru-ary, but then fell with the tariff theater in Q2
Trump's race for the midterm elections is likely to determine a lot
At around USD170bn, Elon Musk's American savings efforts (DOGE) fall short of his target of USD1trn-2trn and are likely to come to nothing with his departure. Instead, the Trump administration is now trying to “grow its way out” of the debt crisis by means of tax cuts. Whether this will succeed is unclear. What is certain is that the plans will initially result in even more debt – an estimated USD2trn-3trn over 10 years, most of it in the next few years. The details of the tax plans and their implications are likely to be among the defining issues in the third quarter. It is unlikely that the plans will be adopted before August or September. However, Trump is under pressure to deliver on his election promises and stimulate the flagging economy, as the mid-term elections are less than 18 months away and his approval ratings are in the basement. To avoid looking like a “lame duck” afterwards, Trump needs a strong labour market, a robust economy and low interest rates.
Potential for the gold price to increase with US debt
In view of rising government debt and a depreciating US dollar, not only in the USA, gold remains in demand as a safe haven
Rising sovereign debt: Risk for government bonds and the dollar, opportunity for tangible assets (equities, gold), global diversification
However, higher debt, robust growth and persistently high inflation argue against falling yields. In the coming years, the US government will probably have to find buyers for an additional USD500bn-600bn in government bonds every quarter. This is only likely to succeed with high yields and an even weaker US dollar, especially as rising government debt is a global phenomenon. The IMF recently emphasised that in countries that account for 80% of global GDP, government debt is higher than before the pandemic and the increase is accelerating. Trump can hardly hope for lower interest rates from the Fed in the short term either. Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell is still in office until May 2026. Trump’s only option is to determine his successor early on with someone who is in favour of interest rate cuts, renewed quantitative easing or even control of the yield curve – in the hope that the markets are already pricing this in. Whether this will help to stop the rising bond yields of longer maturities seems questionable to us, however.
Probably weaker dollar and further rise in bond yields
30-year bonds have risen to 5% in the USA and 3% in Germany and Japan; US dollar falls despite rising UST yields
Government bonds are the victims when high, rising and pro-cyclical fiscal spending makes a recession less likely, increases the supply of bonds and supports equities, gold and other commodities. Last, but not least, the associated inflation risks make the protection of purchasing power more important for investors. We have long argued that an environment of rising government debt, increasing fiscal dominance and financial repression to ensure the debt sustainability of the state argues for a significant proportion of investments with a tangible asset character in the portfolio, at the expense of bonds. In recent decades, the price of gold has risen in parallel with US debt. If both continue to develop in parallel, the price of gold is likely to reach USD6,000 per ounce in 2035. This would correspond to an annualised yield of 6.3%. We consider further increases in US bond yields for longer maturities to be the main risk for the markets. However, a weakening US economy could temporarily reduce this risk. The US dollar is likely to weaken further in the medium term, similar to the phase from 2003 to 2008. A normalisation of the valuation of the US dollar and of US dollar investments in the coming years is likely, which points to a better medium-term relative performance of investments outside the US. In particular, investors who have bet heavily on US investments in recent years should reconsider this.
Author

Prof. Dr. Bernd Meyer
Prof. Dr. Bernd Meyer has been Chief Investment Strategist at Berenberg Wealth and Asset Management since October 2017, where he is responsible for discretionary multi-asset strategies and wealth management mandates. Prof. Dr. Meyer was initially Head of European Equity Strategy at Deutsche Bank in Frankfurt and London and, from 2010, Head of Global Cross Asset Strategy Research at Commerzbank. In this role Prof. Dr. Meyer has received several awards. In the renowned Extel Survey from 2013 to 2017, he and his team ranked among the top three multi-asset research teams worldwide. Prof. Dr. Meyer is DVFA Investment Analyst, Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) and guest lecturer for "Empirical Research in Finance" at the University of Trier. He has published numerous articles and two books and received three scientific awards.